The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
|
eq(0,0) |
→ |
true |
(1) |
|
eq(0,s(Y)) |
→ |
false |
(2) |
|
eq(s(X),0) |
→ |
false |
(3) |
|
eq(s(X),s(Y)) |
→ |
eq(X,Y) |
(4) |
|
le(0,Y) |
→ |
true |
(5) |
|
le(s(X),0) |
→ |
false |
(6) |
|
le(s(X),s(Y)) |
→ |
le(X,Y) |
(7) |
|
min(cons(0,nil)) |
→ |
0 |
(8) |
|
min(cons(s(N),nil)) |
→ |
s(N) |
(9) |
|
min(cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
→ |
ifmin(le(N,M),cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
(10) |
|
ifmin(true,cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
→ |
min(cons(N,L)) |
(11) |
|
ifmin(false,cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
→ |
min(cons(M,L)) |
(12) |
|
replace(N,M,nil) |
→ |
nil |
(13) |
|
replace(N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
ifrepl(eq(N,K),N,M,cons(K,L)) |
(14) |
|
ifrepl(true,N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
cons(M,L) |
(15) |
|
ifrepl(false,N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
cons(K,replace(N,M,L)) |
(16) |
|
selsort(nil) |
→ |
nil |
(17) |
|
selsort(cons(N,L)) |
→ |
ifselsort(eq(N,min(cons(N,L))),cons(N,L)) |
(18) |
|
ifselsort(true,cons(N,L)) |
→ |
cons(N,selsort(L)) |
(19) |
|
ifselsort(false,cons(N,L)) |
→ |
cons(min(cons(N,L)),selsort(replace(min(cons(N,L)),N,L))) |
(20) |
|
eq#(s(X),s(Y)) |
→ |
eq#(X,Y) |
(21) |
|
le#(s(X),s(Y)) |
→ |
le#(X,Y) |
(22) |
|
min#(cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
→ |
le#(N,M) |
(23) |
|
min#(cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
→ |
ifmin#(le(N,M),cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
(24) |
|
ifmin#(true,cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
→ |
min#(cons(N,L)) |
(25) |
|
ifmin#(false,cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
→ |
min#(cons(M,L)) |
(26) |
|
replace#(N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
eq#(N,K) |
(27) |
|
replace#(N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
ifrepl#(eq(N,K),N,M,cons(K,L)) |
(28) |
|
ifrepl#(false,N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
replace#(N,M,L) |
(29) |
|
selsort#(cons(N,L)) |
→ |
min#(cons(N,L)) |
(30) |
|
selsort#(cons(N,L)) |
→ |
eq#(N,min(cons(N,L))) |
(31) |
|
selsort#(cons(N,L)) |
→ |
ifselsort#(eq(N,min(cons(N,L))),cons(N,L)) |
(32) |
|
ifselsort#(true,cons(N,L)) |
→ |
selsort#(L) |
(33) |
|
ifselsort#(false,cons(N,L)) |
→ |
replace#(min(cons(N,L)),N,L) |
(34) |
|
ifselsort#(false,cons(N,L)) |
→ |
selsort#(replace(min(cons(N,L)),N,L)) |
(35) |
|
ifselsort#(false,cons(N,L)) |
→ |
min#(cons(N,L)) |
(36) |
The dependency pairs are split into 5
components.
-
The
1st
component contains the
pair
|
ifselsort#(false,cons(N,L)) |
→ |
selsort#(replace(min(cons(N,L)),N,L)) |
(35) |
|
selsort#(cons(N,L)) |
→ |
ifselsort#(eq(N,min(cons(N,L))),cons(N,L)) |
(32) |
|
ifselsort#(true,cons(N,L)) |
→ |
selsort#(L) |
(33) |
1.1.1 Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the
| prec(ifselsort#) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(ifselsort#) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(selsort#) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(selsort#) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(ifrepl) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(ifrepl) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(replace) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(replace) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(ifmin) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(ifmin) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(min) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(min) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(cons) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(cons) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(nil) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(nil) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(le) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(le) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(false) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(false) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(s) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(s) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(true) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(true) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(eq) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(eq) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(0) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(0) |
= |
lex
|
| π(ifselsort#) |
= |
2 |
| π(selsort#) |
= |
1 |
| π(ifrepl) |
= |
4 |
| π(replace) |
= |
3 |
| π(ifmin) |
= |
[] |
| π(min) |
= |
1 |
| π(cons) |
= |
[2] |
| π(nil) |
= |
[] |
| π(le) |
= |
2 |
| π(false) |
= |
[] |
| π(s) |
= |
1 |
| π(true) |
= |
[] |
| π(eq) |
= |
[] |
| π(0) |
= |
[] |
together with the usable
rules
|
replace(N,M,nil) |
→ |
nil |
(13) |
|
replace(N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
ifrepl(eq(N,K),N,M,cons(K,L)) |
(14) |
|
ifrepl(true,N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
cons(M,L) |
(15) |
|
ifrepl(false,N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
cons(K,replace(N,M,L)) |
(16) |
(w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the reduction pair),
the
pairs
|
ifselsort#(false,cons(N,L)) |
→ |
selsort#(replace(min(cons(N,L)),N,L)) |
(35) |
|
ifselsort#(true,cons(N,L)) |
→ |
selsort#(L) |
(33) |
could be deleted.
1.1.1.1 Dependency Graph Processor
The dependency pairs are split into 0
components.
-
The
2nd
component contains the
pair
|
replace#(N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
ifrepl#(eq(N,K),N,M,cons(K,L)) |
(28) |
|
ifrepl#(false,N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
replace#(N,M,L) |
(29) |
1.1.2 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
|
replace#(N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
ifrepl#(eq(N,K),N,M,cons(K,L)) |
(28) |
|
|
| 3 |
≥ |
4 |
| 2 |
≥ |
3 |
| 1 |
≥ |
2 |
|
ifrepl#(false,N,M,cons(K,L)) |
→ |
replace#(N,M,L) |
(29) |
|
|
| 4 |
> |
3 |
| 3 |
≥ |
2 |
| 2 |
≥ |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
3rd
component contains the
pair
|
eq#(s(X),s(Y)) |
→ |
eq#(X,Y) |
(21) |
1.1.3 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
|
eq#(s(X),s(Y)) |
→ |
eq#(X,Y) |
(21) |
|
|
| 2 |
> |
2 |
| 1 |
> |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
4th
component contains the
pair
|
min#(cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
→ |
ifmin#(le(N,M),cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
(24) |
|
ifmin#(true,cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
→ |
min#(cons(N,L)) |
(25) |
|
ifmin#(false,cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
→ |
min#(cons(M,L)) |
(26) |
1.1.4 Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the arctic semiring over the integers
| [false] |
= |
2 |
| [s(x1)] |
= |
0 · x1 +
-∞ |
| [min#(x1)] |
= |
0 · x1 + 0 |
| [ifmin#(x1, x2)] |
= |
0 · x1 + 0 · x2 + 0 |
| [le(x1, x2)] |
= |
1 · x1 +
-∞ · x2 + 2 |
| [0] |
= |
3 |
| [cons(x1, x2)] |
= |
2 · x1 + 2 · x2 + 0 |
| [true] |
= |
3 |
together with the usable
rules
|
le(0,Y) |
→ |
true |
(5) |
|
le(s(X),0) |
→ |
false |
(6) |
|
le(s(X),s(Y)) |
→ |
le(X,Y) |
(7) |
(w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the reduction pair),
the
pair
|
ifmin#(false,cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
→ |
min#(cons(M,L)) |
(26) |
could be deleted.
1.1.4.1 Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the arctic semiring over the integers
| [false] |
= |
1 |
| [s(x1)] |
= |
0 · x1 +
-∞ |
| [min#(x1)] |
= |
2 · x1 + -16 |
| [ifmin#(x1, x2)] |
= |
-∞ · x1 + 2 · x2 + 0 |
| [le(x1, x2)] |
= |
0 · x1 + 3 · x2 +
-∞ |
| [0] |
= |
0 |
| [cons(x1, x2)] |
= |
-∞ · x1 + 1 · x2 + -2 |
| [true] |
= |
3 |
having no usable rules (w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the
reduction pair),
the
pair
|
ifmin#(true,cons(N,cons(M,L))) |
→ |
min#(cons(N,L)) |
(25) |
could be deleted.
1.1.4.1.1 Dependency Graph Processor
The dependency pairs are split into 0
components.
-
The
5th
component contains the
pair
|
le#(s(X),s(Y)) |
→ |
le#(X,Y) |
(22) |
1.1.5 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
|
le#(s(X),s(Y)) |
→ |
le#(X,Y) |
(22) |
|
|
| 2 |
> |
2 |
| 1 |
> |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.