The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
| a(x1) | → | b(c(b(c(x1)))) | (1) |
| b(b(x1)) | → | x1 | (2) |
| c(c(b(x1))) | → | a(c(x1)) | (3) |
| a#(x1) | → | c#(x1) | (4) |
| a#(x1) | → | b#(c(x1)) | (5) |
| a#(x1) | → | c#(b(c(x1))) | (6) |
| a#(x1) | → | b#(c(b(c(x1)))) | (7) |
| c#(c(b(x1))) | → | c#(x1) | (8) |
| c#(c(b(x1))) | → | a#(c(x1)) | (9) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| c#(c(b(x1))) | → | c#(x1) | (8) |
| c#(c(b(x1))) | → | a#(c(x1)) | (9) |
| a#(x1) | → | c#(x1) | (4) |
| a#(x1) | → | c#(b(c(x1))) | (6) |
| [c#(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||
| [c(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||
| [a#(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||
| [a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||
| [b(x1)] | = |
|
| a(x1) | → | b(c(b(c(x1)))) | (1) |
| b(b(x1)) | → | x1 | (2) |
| c(c(b(x1))) | → | a(c(x1)) | (3) |
| a#(x1) | → | c#(x1) | (4) |
| a#(x1) | → | c#(b(c(x1))) | (6) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| c#(c(b(x1))) | → | c#(x1) | (8) |
Using size-change termination in combination with the subterm criterion one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
| c#(c(b(x1))) | → | c#(x1) | (8) |
| 1 | > | 1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.