The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
| a(x1) | → | x1 | (1) |
| a(b(x1)) | → | c(b(c(b(a(x1))))) | (2) |
| b(x1) | → | a(x1) | (3) |
| c(c(x1)) | → | x1 | (4) |
| a#(b(x1)) | → | a#(x1) | (5) |
| a#(b(x1)) | → | b#(a(x1)) | (6) |
| a#(b(x1)) | → | c#(b(a(x1))) | (7) |
| a#(b(x1)) | → | b#(c(b(a(x1)))) | (8) |
| a#(b(x1)) | → | c#(b(c(b(a(x1))))) | (9) |
| b#(x1) | → | a#(x1) | (10) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| b#(x1) | → | a#(x1) | (10) |
| a#(b(x1)) | → | a#(x1) | (5) |
| a#(b(x1)) | → | b#(a(x1)) | (6) |
| a#(b(x1)) | → | b#(c(b(a(x1)))) | (8) |
| [b#(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||
| [b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||
| [a#(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||
| [a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||
| [c(x1)] | = |
|
| a(x1) | → | x1 | (1) |
| a(b(x1)) | → | c(b(c(b(a(x1))))) | (2) |
| b(x1) | → | a(x1) | (3) |
| c(c(x1)) | → | x1 | (4) |
| a#(b(x1)) | → | a#(x1) | (5) |
| a#(b(x1)) | → | b#(a(x1)) | (6) |
| [b#(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||
| [b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||
| [a#(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||
| [a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||
| [c(x1)] | = |
|
| a(x1) | → | x1 | (1) |
| a(b(x1)) | → | c(b(c(b(a(x1))))) | (2) |
| b(x1) | → | a(x1) | (3) |
| c(c(x1)) | → | x1 | (4) |
| b#(x1) | → | a#(x1) | (10) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.