Certification Problem

Input (TPDB SRS_Standard/ICFP_2010/264405)

The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.

0(1(2(3(4(x1))))) → 0(2(3(1(4(x1))))) (1)
0(5(1(2(3(4(x1)))))) → 0(1(2(5(3(4(x1)))))) (2)
0(5(1(2(3(4(x1)))))) → 0(5(2(1(3(4(x1)))))) (3)
0(5(1(2(3(4(x1)))))) → 5(0(2(3(1(4(x1)))))) (4)
0(5(2(3(1(4(x1)))))) → 0(1(5(2(3(4(x1)))))) (5)

Property / Task

Prove or disprove termination.

Answer / Result

Yes.

Proof (by matchbox @ termCOMP 2023)

1 String Reversal

Since only unary symbols occur, one can reverse all terms and obtains the TRS
4(3(2(1(0(x1))))) → 4(1(3(2(0(x1))))) (6)
4(3(2(1(5(0(x1)))))) → 4(3(5(2(1(0(x1)))))) (7)
4(3(2(1(5(0(x1)))))) → 4(3(1(2(5(0(x1)))))) (8)
4(3(2(1(5(0(x1)))))) → 4(1(3(2(0(5(x1)))))) (9)
4(1(3(2(5(0(x1)))))) → 4(3(2(5(1(0(x1)))))) (10)

1.1 Dependency Pair Transformation

The following set of initial dependency pairs has been identified.
4#(3(2(1(5(0(x1)))))) → 4#(3(5(2(1(0(x1)))))) (11)
4#(3(2(1(5(0(x1)))))) → 4#(3(1(2(5(0(x1)))))) (12)
4#(3(2(1(5(0(x1)))))) → 4#(1(3(2(0(5(x1)))))) (13)
4#(3(2(1(0(x1))))) → 4#(1(3(2(0(x1))))) (14)
4#(1(3(2(5(0(x1)))))) → 4#(3(2(5(1(0(x1)))))) (15)

1.1.1 Dependency Graph Processor

The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.