Certification Problem

Input (TPDB SRS_Standard/Mixed_SRS/turing_add)

The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.

1(q0(1(x1))) → 0(1(q1(x1))) (1)
1(q0(0(x1))) → 0(0(q1(x1))) (2)
1(q1(1(x1))) → 1(1(q1(x1))) (3)
1(q1(0(x1))) → 1(0(q1(x1))) (4)
0(q1(x1)) → q2(1(x1)) (5)
1(q2(x1)) → q2(1(x1)) (6)
0(q2(x1)) → 0(q0(x1)) (7)

Property / Task

Prove or disprove termination.

Answer / Result

Yes.

Proof (by AProVE @ termCOMP 2023)

1 String Reversal

Since only unary symbols occur, one can reverse all terms and obtains the TRS
1(q0(1(x1))) → q1(1(0(x1))) (8)
0(q0(1(x1))) → q1(0(0(x1))) (9)
1(q1(1(x1))) → q1(1(1(x1))) (10)
0(q1(1(x1))) → q1(0(1(x1))) (11)
q1(0(x1)) → 1(q2(x1)) (12)
q2(1(x1)) → 1(q2(x1)) (13)
q2(0(x1)) → q0(0(x1)) (14)

1.1 Dependency Pair Transformation

The following set of initial dependency pairs has been identified.
1#(q0(1(x1))) → q1#(1(0(x1))) (15)
1#(q0(1(x1))) → 1#(0(x1)) (16)
1#(q0(1(x1))) → 0#(x1) (17)
0#(q0(1(x1))) → q1#(0(0(x1))) (18)
0#(q0(1(x1))) → 0#(0(x1)) (19)
0#(q0(1(x1))) → 0#(x1) (20)
1#(q1(1(x1))) → q1#(1(1(x1))) (21)
1#(q1(1(x1))) → 1#(1(x1)) (22)
0#(q1(1(x1))) → q1#(0(1(x1))) (23)
0#(q1(1(x1))) → 0#(1(x1)) (24)
q1#(0(x1)) → 1#(q2(x1)) (25)
q1#(0(x1)) → q2#(x1) (26)
q2#(1(x1)) → 1#(q2(x1)) (27)
q2#(1(x1)) → q2#(x1) (28)

1.1.1 Dependency Graph Processor

The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.