Certification Problem

Input (TPDB SRS_Relative/Waldmann_19/random-95)

The relative rewrite relation R/S is considered where R is the following TRS

a(b(c(x1))) → c(c(c(x1))) (1)
b(a(b(x1))) → c(a(a(x1))) (2)

and S is the following TRS.

b(c(a(x1))) → a(a(c(x1))) (3)
a(c(c(x1))) → c(b(a(x1))) (4)
b(a(b(x1))) → b(c(c(x1))) (5)
b(b(c(x1))) → a(c(b(x1))) (6)
c(a(a(x1))) → c(a(a(x1))) (7)

Property / Task

Prove or disprove termination.

Answer / Result

Yes.

Proof (by matchbox @ termCOMP 2023)

1 Dependency Pair Transformation

The following set of initial dependency pairs has been identified.
b#(c(a(x1))) → a#(c(x1)) (8)
b#(c(a(x1))) → a#(a(c(x1))) (9)
b#(b(c(x1))) → b#(x1) (10)
b#(b(c(x1))) → a#(c(b(x1))) (11)
b#(a(b(x1))) → b#(c(c(x1))) (12)
b#(a(b(x1))) → a#(x1) (13)
b#(a(b(x1))) → a#(a(x1)) (14)
a#(c(c(x1))) → b#(a(x1)) (15)
a#(c(c(x1))) → a#(x1) (16)

1.1 Monotonic Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules

Using the matrix interpretations of dimension 1 with strict dimension 1 over the rationals with delta = 1
[c(x1)] = x1 +
2
[b(x1)] = x1 +
2
[a(x1)] = x1 +
2
[b#(x1)] = x1 +
2
[a#(x1)] = x1 +
1
together with the usable rules
a(b(c(x1))) → c(c(c(x1))) (1)
b(a(b(x1))) → c(a(a(x1))) (2)
b(c(a(x1))) → a(a(c(x1))) (3)
a(c(c(x1))) → c(b(a(x1))) (4)
b(a(b(x1))) → b(c(c(x1))) (5)
b(b(c(x1))) → a(c(b(x1))) (6)
(w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the reduction pair), the pairs
b#(c(a(x1))) → a#(c(x1)) (8)
b#(c(a(x1))) → a#(a(c(x1))) (9)
b#(b(c(x1))) → b#(x1) (10)
b#(b(c(x1))) → a#(c(b(x1))) (11)
b#(a(b(x1))) → a#(x1) (13)
b#(a(b(x1))) → a#(a(x1)) (14)
a#(c(c(x1))) → b#(a(x1)) (15)
a#(c(c(x1))) → a#(x1) (16)
and no rules could be deleted.

1.1.1 Dependency Graph Processor

The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.