Certification Problem

Input (COPS 63)

We consider the TRS containing the following rules:

-(0,0) → 0 (1)
-(s(x),0) → s(x) (2)
-(x,s(y)) → -(d(x),y) (3)
d(s(x)) → x (4)
-(s(x),s(y)) → -(x,y) (5)
-(d(x),y) → -(x,s(y)) (6)

The underlying signature is as follows:

{-/2, 0/0, s/1, d/1}

Property / Task

Prove or disprove confluence.

Answer / Result

Yes.

Proof (by ACP @ CoCo 2020)

1 Strongly closed

Confluence is proven since the TRS is strongly closed. The joins can be performed using 3 step(s).